Pride and Prejudice and Zombies–Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith

Image

As a HUGE fan of Pride and Prejudice, I was intrigued by the premise, but had to fight my annoyance at the fact that Grahame-Smith had been handed an idea and played cut and paste with some zombie bits to create this pretty popular variation.

I won’t lie.  This annoyance resurfaced at moments throughout the novel.  Until I hit this exchange during the infamous visit to Pemberley with Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner:

“She remembered the lead ammunition in her pocket and offered it to him.  ‘Your balls, Mr. Darcy?’  He reached out and closed her hand around them, and offered, ‘They belong to you, Miss Bennet.”

How could I not be seduced by such open mockery of the beloved love story?  This seduction was sealed in the Reader’s Discussion Guide, in which question #7 reads: “Does Mrs. Bennet have a single redeeming quality?”  

Grahame-Smith leaves intact entire beloved paragraphs, but his Bennet girls are zombie killers who hone their fighting skills rather than embroidery and piano.  Instead of being confined to Longbourn, they have traveled to China to study with a martial arts master.  When Mr. Darcy first proposes, Elizabeth Bennet smashes his head into the mantel rather than eviscerating him with her tongue.  This was not appealing to me, but it reeled in my pre-teen son, who would not have touched Pride and Prejudice with a ten-foot pole had it not included zombies.  In the end, many readers may be left with the last discussion guide question, “Can you imagine what this novel might be like without the violent zombie mayhem?”

Finished 11/12/13

 

Advertisements

The Signature of All Things–Elizabeth Gilbert

Image

For anyone who has read Eat, Pray, Love, Gilbert’s novel about Alma Whittaker may come as a surprise.  Gone is the whiny, spoiled indulgence of the first 1/3 of Eat, Pray, Love.  Alma Whittaker was not raised to be a whiner.  She was not even raised to think about the divine.  Instead, Alma was raised to be the ultimate rationalist.  Her father’s searing reason took him from the slums of London to a palace in Pennsylvania.  Her mother’s surgical precision instilled in Alma a scientific discipline that left little room for emotion.  Love finds Alma, however, as does lust. Lust, like all of her knowledge, comes from books.  The lab in which she experiments is a binding closet.  Yes, a binding closet.  Lust also finds Alma in the person of Ambrose Pike, whom she comes to love only after he is gone and she has pursued his ghost halfway around the world.

Gilbert’s Alma is an unlikely woman, but not so unlikely for the 18th century.  She is tall, ungainly, broad, plain, and cursed with curly hair before the age of silicone-based hair products.  She is talented in languages and has a wide capacity for categorization.  Unlike Gilbert, Alma’s world remains, for more than half of her life, contained to her family estate.  Then to an island, then a ship, then the city of Amsterdam.  Her body is bound by physical space, but her mind ranges widely, even to the great theory of her day, evolution.  

Gilbert’s writing is precise, much like Alma’s mind.  Like Alma, Gilbert’s prose finds moments of poetry.  Gilbert embodies Alma’s voice so beautifully that we see through Alma’s eyes even as we look on Alma with wonder and pity.  

The title reveals Gilbert’s continuing interest in the divinity of the world.  The signature of all things, we are told, is an idea that God revealed the secret of the world throughout nature.  We have only to look closely enough, to listen closely enough, to perceive it.  

I finished this novel wondering what moved Gilbert to write it.  Why Alma in the 18th and 19th centuries?  The book jacket may provide one clue:  Alma’s “age” is described as “that extraordinary moment in human history when all the old assumptions about science, religion, commerce, and class were exploding into dangerous new ideas.”  Another clue comes from Gilbert’s acknowledgements, in which she quotes Christine de Pisan and gives special recognition to all women of science.  Because women have always asked Gilbert’s questions, even when they did not have the voices to ask them publicly or for posterity.

Finished 11/3/13